sammccall added a comment. In D60822#1470227 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60822#1470227>, @kadircet wrote:
> I agree that these are more useful. What about also adding "-W" in front of > warning flags to make them more explicit and stand out from "non-flag" error > names? I went back and forth on this, I think you're probably right. It's consistent with how clang-tidy check names vs warnings are exposed to users: "Diag text [-Wfoo]" and "Diag text [check-name]". Let's see how it goes. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60822/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60822 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
