Eugene.Zelenko added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-redundant-access-specifiers.rst:34 + If set to non-zero, the check will also give warning if the first access + specifier declaration is redundant (e.g. `private` inside `class`). Default + is `0`. ---------------- Please use double back-ticks for language keywords, like private anc class. ================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-redundant-access-specifiers.rst:47 + +If ``CheckFirstDeclaration`` option is enabled, a warning about redundant +access specifier will be emitted, since ``public`` is the default member access ---------------- Please use single back-ticks for option names. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55793/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55793 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
