Thanks - I think there's quite a lot of background missing here: what/who is this for, why a separate binary from clangd-indexer (or and how do they relate, how much of the BackgroundIndex code structure makes sense with multiple users.
I assume there's been some offline discussion about this, but i missed it :-) On Thu, Apr 11, 2019, 18:16 Ilya Biryukov via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: > ilya-biryukov added a comment. > > To make it clear, I think the question is not just "which part of > functionality is missing in BackgroundIndex", it's rather "which part of > BackgroundIndex we **don't** need". > > > Repository: > rG LLVM Github Monorepo > > CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION > https://reviews.llvm.org/D59605/new/ > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D59605 > > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
