lebedev.ri added a comment. In D60151#1462976 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60151#1462976>, @hintonda wrote:
> In D60151#1462850 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60151#1462850>, @MyDeveloperDay > wrote: > > > are we supporting "-llvm-*" in existing .clang-tidy files? > > > > If people selectively turn checkers off, won't all of a sudden everyone > > start getting llvm-project checks and fixes turned back on? > > > > https://github.com/search?q=-llvm-%2A&type=Code > > > > maybe we need to add something like: > > > > llvm-header-guard (redirects to llvm-project-header-guard) > > <llvm-header-guard> > > llvm-header-include-order (redirects to llvm-project-include-order) > > <llvm-include-order> > > llvm-header-namespace-comment(redirects to > > llvm-project-namespace-comment) <llvm-namespace-comment> > > llvm-header-twine-local(redirects to llvm-project-twine-local) > > <llvm-twine-local> > > > > > > > I suppose we could keep the names and directory structure and just change the > namespace. That would just be a special case in the scripts. Haven't looked > into it yet, but will do so as soon as I can. Isn't that matching done on strings? I.e. is there difference between `-llvm-*` and `-ll*` ? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60151/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60151 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
