hubert.reinterpretcast added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120#337144, @nemanjai wrote:
> Do you suggest that we need to allow operations (or at least assignments) > between the two types and take away the diagnostics that are part of this > patch? My overriding concern at this time is to allow (or not) the operations consistently (that is, not making it platform-specific). The net result is that we will allow operations between the two types; however, we will encounter a further issue to discuss (@rjmccall @rsmith; your input requested) regarding what the common type should be when the representations are the same (the TS prefers the standard floating type, which is `long double` here). As for the diagnostics, the IEEEquad to PPCDoubleDouble conversion still requires checks for narrowing. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
