takuto.ikuta added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp:154
   if (HaveLexer) {
+    llvm::TimeTraceScope TimeScope("Frontend", StringRef(""));
     P.Initialize();
----------------
anton-afanasyev wrote:
> takuto.ikuta wrote:
> > Remove StringRef?
> I use `StringRef("")` to explicitly cast to one of overloaded 
> `TimeScope(StringRef, StringRef)` and `TimeScope(StringRef, 
> fuction_ref(std::string()))`.
I think function_ref(std::string()) does not have constructor receiving 
StringRef, so I feel explicit cast is redundant.



================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Support/TimeProfiler.cpp:103
+
+    *OS << "{ \"traceEvents\": [\n";
+
----------------
anton-afanasyev wrote:
> takuto.ikuta wrote:
> > Don't we want to use json utility for this?
> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/include/llvm/Support/JSON.h
> > 
> This implementation looks compact and fast. I've read proposal for this 
> library 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OEF9IauWwNuSigZzvvbjc1cVS1uGHRyGTXaoy3DjqM4
>  , it's recent, so I'm not sure it's stable and speed optimized. Do you 
> actually can advise it? I can do it in the next refactor commit as well.
Hmm, I think using json library is preferred because we don't need to take care 
the correctness of json format.
Confirming correctness of json format with many escaped literals is bit hard 
and I'm afraid to miss json format error.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Support/TimeProfiler.cpp:44
+    default:
+      if (isPrint(C)) {
+        OS += C;
----------------
anton-afanasyev wrote:
> takuto.ikuta wrote:
> > include StringExtras.h for this?
> Should one do it? It's already implicitly included.
I think it is better to do, because if someone removes the StringExtras.h 
include used for this file, they need to include header in this file at the 
same time. That may require to touch unrelated files in their change.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Support/TimeProfiler.cpp:75
+  void end() {
+    assert(!Stack.empty() && "Must call Begin first");
+    auto &E = Stack.back();
----------------
s/Begin/begin/


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D58675/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D58675



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to