On 3/19/19 11:10 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
It sounds like there might be a missing check for InitListExpr::isTransparent somewhere. (A transparent InitListExpr should be treated as equivalent to its one and only subexpression.) Either that, or the static analyzer isn't aware that an object of class type can be initialized directly from a function call, not via a constructor.
Indeed, thanks! And, as usual, more bugs on top of that. (https://reviews.llvm.org/D59573) On 3/19/19 11:00 AM, Alexander Kornienko wrote:
just adding -std=c++17 on existing code (LLVM, for example ;) could help uncover some of the issues
Hmm, fair enough :D I'm glad i asked :) _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
