rsmith abandoned this revision. rsmith added a comment. In D58154#1420565 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58154#1420565>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> If we go with a different name for the flag, then the user has to update > their build scripts to get code to compile with Clang, which means it > shouldn't be too onerous for them to spell out the specific diagnostics they > need disabled (and it sort of forces them into somewhat better code hygiene > by not disabling all diagnostics). I'm kind of leaning towards not providing > a flag at all. I would certainly prefer that people explicitly list the `-Wno-whatever` flags they're relying on when porting to Clang. There might still be some benefit in `-Wno-error=everything`, but it seems questionable (as James points out, users who don't enjoy build spam would likely reach for `-Wno-everything` instead). In any case, I think we have consensus that this patch is the wrong direction. Abandoning. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58154/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58154 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
