sbc100 added a comment. In D58742#1413077 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58742#1413077>, @sunfish wrote:
> This is still a little confusing to me. -matomic is supposed to be a > subtarget flag, stating that the wasm implementation we will run on supports > atomic instructions. -mthread-model posix is about the C++ interpretation -- > what style implementation of memory model do we want? In the future, -matomic > may become enabled by default, when enough wasm engines generally support it. > However, -mthread-model single/posix may still be useful to control > independently, because even with wasm engines supporting atomic, there are > reasons users might still want to compile their apps single-threaded: access > to linear memory with no declared max, lower overall code size, or other > things. " -mthread-model posix is about the C++ interpretation" .. are you sure about that? `git grep getThreadModel` shows basically no use of this. Digging a little deeper.. The thread-model thing was introduced here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4984 and was clearly related to the underlying architecture. Apart from wasm nobody else has ever starting using this is given it any other meaning as far as I can tell. Maybe I'm missing something? Repository: rLLD LLVM Linker CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58742/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58742 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
