klimek added a comment. In D58345#1406892 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58345#1406892>, @sammccall wrote:
> Sorry to be a pain here, but I'm not sure introducing Javascript is a good > idea unless there's a strong reason for it. > All LLVM developers have python installed, many are comfortable with the > language - it seems less likely to be a maintenance hazard. I can recommend > BeautifulSoup for the HTML parsing stuff. > (For the record, I kind of hate python, but I'm more comfortable reviewing > and maintaining it than JS). > Mitigating points: we have some in the VSCode plugin by necessity, and this > isn't a build-time dependency. > > Happy to get another opinion here. > > > Added the tool in this patch, but I think a separate repository under > > GitHub's clangd org might be a more suitable place. > > I'm somewhat sympathetic to this idea, but I don't think we can do it as > things stand. @klimek can confirm. I unfortunately agree with Sam on this. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58345/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58345 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
