lattner added a comment.

I can understand Zach's position here, but LLDB has historically never 
conformed to the general LLVM naming or other conventions due to its heritage.  
It should not be taken as precedent that the rest of the project should follow.

In any case, I think that it is best for this discussion to take place on the 
llvm-dev list where it is likely to get the most visibility.  Would you mind 
moving comments and discussions there?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to