thakis added a comment. Thanks for starting the thread, Reid.
In D58157#1397260 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58157#1397260>, @mehdi_amini wrote: > Sorry, I don't have time to do archeology for you right now. But this is > beside the point: your patch is changing a 2 years status quo, so my take on > it is that it is *on you* to build the consensus to change this (maybe the > consensus exists, I don't know, but this Phabricator diff alone seems quite > light to demonstrate evidence of it). The "2 years" isn't very relevant since the monorepo was some unofficial optional thing for most of those 2 years imho. >> Else, I think this has seen more discussion than the change that is undoing. >> It also has the support of several folks very actively working on clang and >> clang-tools-extra. > > Again: I have no incentive to weigh one way or another with respect to what > is the right way forward for clang-tools-extra, so I don't care what happens > here. Cool. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58157/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58157 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
