rjmccall added a comment. In D57768#1386862 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57768#1386862>, @Anastasia wrote:
> - SYCL seem to require adding tight dependencies from the standard libraries > into the compiler because many language features are hidden behind library > classes. This is not common for Clang. We had a discussion about this issue > during the implementation of OpenCL C++ and it was decided not to go this > route for upstream Clang. Can you explain your current approach to implement > this? I think @rjmccall or @rsmith might need to be involved in this. I'd like to know more about this, but I'll point out that this isn't unprecedented: - C compilers have hard-coded knowledge about `va_list`. - C++ compilers have hard-coded knowledge about `std::type_info` and `std::initializer_list` (and possibly others I've forgotten). Whether that's the right direction for SYCL, though, I can't say until I understand more about what dependencies are being proposed. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57768/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57768 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
