riccibruno added a comment. In D57649#1382477 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57649#1382477>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D57649#1382470 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57649#1382470>, @riccibruno > wrote: > > > Though it is a subjective distinction and in the end if someone need a flag > > it is going to be added I guess. > > > That's the crux of how we've decided what information to expose in the past. > Some folks will expose the information when adding it to an AST node, but not > always. More often what happens is that someone finds they need that > information to help make an AST dump more readable, then the information gets > exposed at that point because there's a use case for it. Which is exactly why I added this flag. From what I understand the AST dump is mostly a tool used by people hacking on clang, and so this make sense. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57649/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57649 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
