leonardchan added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp:3444 case BO_NE: + return Builder.CreateICmpNE(FullLHS, FullRHS); + case BO_Mul: ---------------- rjmccall wrote: > Are padding bits guaranteed zero or unspecified? Or are we just not really > supporting padding bits all the way to IRGen at this time? I believe the consensus was leaving them unspecified, so operations that can cause overflow into them would result in undefined behavior. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57219/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57219 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
