ruiu added a comment.
In D56554#1357385 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56554#1357385>, @mgorny wrote:
> @ruiu, what do you think? The current logic forces some precedence, i.e. if
> you pass `-z nognustack`, further `-z {no,}execstack` are ignored. I suppose
> we could just force passing `-z nognustack` as last option clang-wise.
Are you asking about making the flag tri-state? If so, I think it logically
makes sense and feels more natural to represent it with two boolean flags. As
you said, the last one should always takes precedence over the others among the
three flags.
Repository:
rLLD LLVM Linker
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56554/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56554
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
