yaxunl added a comment. In D56318#1355705 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56318#1355705>, @rjmccall wrote:
> It's pretty unfortunate that all these fields have to be individually called > out like this. Can you move all these basic layout fields into a separate > `struct` (which can be a secondary base class of `TargetInfo`) which can then > just be normally copied? Anything that needs special copy semantics, like > the LLVM `DataLayout` (do you need to copy this?) doesn't need to go into > that struct, just the basic POD things that determine fundamental type > layouts and semantics. LLVM DataLayout contains target specific stuff and cannot be simply copied. So far we did not see necessity to adjust device data layout for host. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56318/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56318 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
