Szelethus added a comment. Cheers, this is as good as it gets! IRL we also mentioned making a unipage for each checker which would be awesome (and would require a lot of tedious work), but as a start, I'd much prefer browsing through this doc than the current one. Very much appreciated!
I won't formally accept this to make it stand out a little more. ================ Comment at: docs/analyzer/checkers.rst:2003 +View Exploded Graphs using GraphViz. + ---------------- While I would argue very strongly against the current website's every effort at hiding implicit checkers, when we deliberately call this site a documentation site, I definitely think that we should most include them here. Although, don't sweat it too much just yet, while the structure is still being decided upon. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
