arphaman added a comment. In D56892#1363089 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56892#1363089>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> I think the documentation for the attribute should be updated to explain this > new behavior, otherwise this will be a very inexplicable feature to users. Done > One question I have is: will this feature also be needed by other attributes? > This seems like a somewhat general problem between explicit attributes, > implicit attributes, and attributes added via the pragma. It might not be > worth generalizing yet, but I'm curious to know whether we'll need this for > things like visibility and type_visibility as well. Possibly. We haven't come across a use case that requires that yet, but we would be definitely willing to work on a more generalized solution in the future if such a need arises. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56892/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56892 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
