ruiu added a comment. In D56215#1345880 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56215#1345880>, @krytarowski wrote:
> In D56215#1345845 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56215#1345845>, @ruiu wrote: > > > Not sure what I understand the point, but as to make lld work on/for > > NetBSD, I wonder if you can just add -L<path> to the command line in the > > compiler driver. Isn't a NetBSD triple passed to the compiler driver? If > > so, I wonder if you can add a few extra options when invoking the linker. > > > This describes the original patch of passing flags from compiler driver and > breaks GNU ld compat. Joerg expects to pass no extra `-L<path>` or > `--disable-new-dtags` options, treating lld as a drop-in replacement for GNU > ld. I don't think you would lose anything by passing `-L<path>` and `--disable-new-dtags` from compiler driver. These flags wouldn't do any harm to GNU linkers. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56215/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56215 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
