jlebar added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16250#328552, @tra wrote:
> Looks OK to me. > Perhaps BoundArch w/o toolchain is sufficient for the key as toolchain would > be derived from it. Yeah, it might work, I wasn't convinced it was sound. The bound TC is derived from the original TC plus the arch -- that is, the arch isn't the only piece of info that goes into it. Dunno, once bitten twice shy. Thank you for the reviews, and thanks again for your patience, Chris. http://reviews.llvm.org/D16250 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
