rjmccall added inline comments.
================ Comment at: include/clang/Sema/DeclSpec.h:1304 + /// DeclSpec for the function with the qualifier related info. + DeclSpec *TypeDeclSpec; + ---------------- Can we give this a better name? I know we use "type qualifiers" for this concept in the AST, but it's not a good name, and we should really rename it in the AST. How about `MethodQualifiers`? ================ Comment at: lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:6129 + // create DeclSpec here to be populated later. + DS = new DeclSpec(AttrFactory); + ---------------- Is it possible to just build into a local DS and then move that DS to the heap if it contains qualifiers or attributes? It'd be nice to not do a heap allocation every time we parse a function declarator in C++ since the vast majority of them don't have qualifiers. (It probably has to be a move to handle attributes and `AttributeFactory` correctly.) That would also side-step any concerns about memory management. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55948/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55948 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits