aaron.ballman added a reviewer: rsmith.
aaron.ballman added a subscriber: rsmith.
aaron.ballman added a comment.
I'd like @rsmith's opinion on whether this is a good churn or not. I think it's
mostly reasonable, but it's also a lot of changes for identical behavior and in
some cases the changes are a bit unfortunate.
================
Comment at: include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h:4504
FunctionDecl)) {
- return Node.isThisDeclarationADefinition();
}
----------------
I don't care for this refactoring -- the new code repeats the types from the
function definition and is considerably harder to read.
================
Comment at: lib/AST/Decl.cpp:2378
+ assert(D);
+ if (auto *Def = D->getDefinition(Context))
+ return Def;
----------------
Bad use of `auto`, though it is used above so maybe it should stay for local
consistency.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:2849
+static std::pair<diag::kind, SourceLocation>
+getNoteDiagForInvalidRedeclaration(const ASTContext &Context, const T *Old,
+ const T *New) {
----------------
I'm not keen on the code duplication. :-(
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55658/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55658
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
