rjmccall added a comment. In D55672#1330458 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D55672#1330458>, @rnk wrote:
> In D55672#1330402 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D55672#1330402>, @rnk wrote: > > > - a specialization of a function template that happens to be declared with > > this calling convention (this also probably shouldn't include the CC in the > > mangling, but it's okay to match GCC if it does) > > > I didn't add a test for this special case, since we don't mangle ccs into > normal functions. I don't think making a function specialization template is > likely to cause us to suddenly emit the convention. Tests are good! Also, we do mangle more things from a function template specialization, like the return type and other things that might trigger SFINAE conditions; it's not the same code path. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55672/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55672 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
