I don’t think we really need this. isn’t Ilya’s solution in the other patch already sufficient? On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 7:34 AM Ivan Donchevskii via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> yvvan added a comment. > > @ilya-biryukov > > Hm. What about another way around? - We have user include paths (-I) and > report them to the filesystem. This means that we have specific paths under > which nothing can be mmaped and everything else can be. In particular cases > we can also report -isystem there. This is quite the same logic as current > isVolatile parameter but is set only once for each path. > > > CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION > https://reviews.llvm.org/D54995/new/ > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D54995 > > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
