On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:26 PM George Karpenkov <ekarpen...@apple.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks I’ll take a look.
>
> BTW when reverting could you use “git revert” or mention manually the 
> phabricator revision being reverted,
> and apply reverts atomically?
> I (and many others) work exclusively using a git monorepo, so I don’t even 
> have a straightforward way to lookup what "r347951” is.

Given that I work exclusively in svn, I won't be using git revert. :-)
I can add the phab revision to the commit log when possible, but I
expect to continue to use svn revisions until the git transition takes
place. FWIW, you can use the mailing lists to look up what r347951
(such as 
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20181126/252804.html).
Sorry for the troubles, though!

~Aaron

>
> Thanks!
>
> > On Nov 30, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:19 PM George Karpenkov <ekarpen...@apple.com> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks and sorry about the trouble. I’ll recommit with size_t.
> >
> > No worries, it happens! FYI, I also had to commit r348023 as part of
> > the reverts.
> >
> > ~Aaron
> >>
> >> On Nov 30, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 9:37 AM Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via
> >> cfe-commits <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> NoQ added inline comments.
> >>
> >>
> >> ================
> >> Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/osobject-retain-release.cpp:27
> >> +
> >> +  static void * operator new(unsigned long size);
> >> +
> >> ----------------
> >> NoQ wrote:
> >>
> >> I think we should use `size_t` as much as possible, because this may 
> >> otherwise have weird consequences on platforms on which `size_t` is not 
> >> defined as `unsigned long`. Not sure if this checker is ran on such 
> >> platforms. But the test doesn't have the triple specified, so it runs 
> >> under the host triple, which may be arbitrary and cause problems on 
> >> buildbots.
> >>
> >> I.e.,
> >>
> >> ```
> >> typedef __typeof(sizeof(int)) size_t;
> >> // use size_t
> >> ```
> >>
> >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv8-lld/builds/440/steps/ninja%20check%202/logs/FAIL%3A%20Clang%3A%3Aosobject-retain-release.cpp
> >>
> >>
> >> I reverted r347949 through r347951 in r348020 to get the bots back to 
> >> green.
> >>
> >> ~Aaron
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Repository:
> >> rC Clang
> >>
> >> CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D55076/new/
> >>
> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D55076
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cfe-commits mailing list
> >> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
> >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
> >>
> >>
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to