grimar added a comment. In D55006#1311400 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D55006#1311400>, @dblaikie wrote:
> In D55006#1311398 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D55006#1311398>, @grimar wrote: > > > In D55006#1311391 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D55006#1311391>, @dblaikie > > wrote: > > > > > Cool - thanks! Any chance/way to add a test for this that'd show up > > > sooner than the breakage caused by the previous version? > > > > > > Maybe, I am not sure. I was not able to trigger this without using the > > `clang-tidy` call yet. > > > Any chance other clang tools might reproduce this? clang-check maybe (sort of > the most trivial clang tool)? I'll try to investigate this tomorrow. Never used it I think :) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55006/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55006 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
