dexonsmith added 1 blocking reviewer(s): arphaman.
dexonsmith added a comment.

In D54630#1308605 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D54630#1308605>, @arphaman wrote:

> Sounds convincing.
>  @dexonsmith What do you think?


Besides maintaining correct behaviour, I think the most important thing here is 
that the code organization is logical.  Header search is complicated and we 
should be trying to make/keep it simple.  I'm a little skeptical that splitting 
this logic between cc1 and the driver will simplify things, but I haven't 
looked in detail and I'll defer to your (collective) judgement.

> @ilya-biryukov I'm going to do some internal testing to see if we uncover any 
> issues.

I've added you as a blocking reviewer since I think we should work through any 
uncovered issues pre-commit.


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D54630/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D54630



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to