riccibruno planned changes to this revision. riccibruno added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54676#1303176, @rjmccall wrote:
> You can have more arguments than parameters because of varargs. Even putting > that aside, no, I think we generally shouldn't go backwards on these limits. > Anyway, packing right up to the limits imposed by `NumExprBits` probably > isn't a great idea. Alright, I think it make sense to wait until it is possible to store the arguments in a trailing array. There are a few places where `Sema` resize the array of arguments in `CallExpr`. From a quick look it seems it should be possible to get rid of them. For now let's mark this "changes planned". Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D54676 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
