On Mon, Nov 12, 2018, 20:53 George Karpenkov via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org wrote:
> george.karpenkov added a comment. > > I don't quite understand the need for this patch. > If we are talking about a binary built from source, wouldn't it make more > sense to build libcxx from source as well? > I'm not sure what you mean by "built from source" - all programs are? The intent is to distribute as binary (I think), and not distribute libcxx. It's important the system stdlib is used, as that's the one consistent with the CDB and the actual build. If libcxx is built from source in the same repo, clang-based tools do find > it. > > > Repository: > rL LLVM > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D54310 > > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
