kpn added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53157#1291978, @cameron.mcinally wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53157#1291964, @kpn wrote: > > > I don't expect anyone would need to switch between constrained and regular > > floating point at an instruction level of granularity. > > > The Standard allows for this (to some degree). E.g. FENV_ACCESS can be > toggled between nested compound statements. Yes, but I'm not worried about what sort of code is input to a compiler. I'm worried about what is right for the compiler itself. Also, since we're in LLVM here, we have to think about all languages that use LLVM as a backend. https://reviews.llvm.org/D53157 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
