probinson added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54187#1290294, @zturner wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54187#1290282, @probinson wrote: > > > +gbedwell > > > > Just to throw the idea out there, why not abandon debuginfo-tests entirely > > and try using Dexter for this. Dexter's design center is debug-info > > quality, not correctness, but it already knows how to drive several > > different debuggers on multiple platforms. > > Dexter would have to become an LLVM project tool, and I'm not sure how > > Sony management feels about that, but I think this would be an awesome > > use-case. > > > Depends where we draw the distinction between quality and correctness. We > specifically want a way to test that when we fix a correctness bug, it's > actually fixed against Microsoft debuggers. Dexter knows how to drive Visual Studio tools already, as well as gdb and (maybe) lldb. I have never looked inside it but I'd expect Greg to have made it straightforward to add new tools. https://reviews.llvm.org/D54187 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
