steveire added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54141#1288930, @JonasToth wrote:
> > Do you understand the proposal now? > > Yes better, I was under the impression that `clang-apply-replaments` is run > on the end and the YAMLs are kept until then. Now its clear. > I assume `--issue-diags` produce the same result as the normal diagnostic > engine. That could work, yes. Great, glad we got that misunderstanding sorted out. > clang-tidy does not have a `quiet` mode though. It has the `-quiet` option > which just does not emit how many warnings were created and suppressed. > Do you have these things already in the pipeline? No, I have not started on these. At least the clang-tidy quiet mode is trivial to implement. Maybe instead of `--quiet` we could have `--stdout=<output_format>` where `output_format` can be one of `none`, `diag`, `yaml` and in the future possibly `json` (requested here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-October/059944.html) or `cbor`, to address the binary output suggestion from @hokein. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D54141 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
