azharudd added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53912#1281584, @rnk wrote:
> This sounds like it would defeat what I'm assuming is the intended purpose of > intrin0.h, which is to reduce compile time. intrin.h is kind of enormous, and > the compile time problems are well-documented. We should investigate what's > up with intrin0.h and implement as many builtins as we need to support it. I agree. This currently resolves issues with building for ARM64 target using Visual Studio 2017. The missing intrinsics it complains about are already present in intrin.h. We could add those to intrin0.h too but that would duplicate. Please let me know what you think. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D53912 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
