lebedev.ri added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53949#1282884, @regehr wrote:
> I do not agree that ++ is performed on the original type. I was only talking about the IR. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53949#1282884, @regehr wrote: > The C99 standard (6.5.3.1.2) appears to be very clear on this point: "The > expression ++E is equivalent to (E+=1)." That is clearly not what clang is doing here. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D53949 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
