aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52400#1267731, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52400#1267499, @sberg wrote: > > > (and in any case, "declaration shadows a variable" sounds wrong when the > > shadowed entity is a class type. thats why I thought something is not quite > > right with this new code yet) > > > Definitely agreed. I think I'm convinced that this should be silenced when > the conflict is with a type rather than a value. I'll try to look into this > next week when I'm back from WG14 meetings. I've silenced this scenario in r344898, thank you for raising the issue! https://reviews.llvm.org/D52400 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
