kbobyrev added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51949#1257430, @JonasToth wrote:
> @kbobyrev is it ok for you if I stick with the `Optional<>` style in the > check? Yes, I think it's fine. Thank you very much for working on the patch, I am indeed very excited about this check. Unfortunately, I won't be able to review the code in the upcoming few weeks as I caught a cold and I'm trying to get better before the LLVM Meeting, so if there is anyone else interested in reviewing proposed changes please feel free to jump in. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D51949 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
