Anastasia added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51402#1252619, @sidorovd wrote:
> @Anastasia , since there is a problem I described, wouldn't you mind if I > stay with the first iteration of the patch (adding the extension to > OpenCLExtensions.def) and after we'll investigate what is wrong with -cl-ext > approach? I would prefer not to add it to Clang directly unless absolutely necessary. I think it's ok to add this in the header for now as is, but then investigate how we can add an architecture guard later. Please, could you just move the testing into `test/Headers/opencl-c-header.cl`, because `test/SemaOpenCL/extension-version.cl` is for Clang built in extensions. https://reviews.llvm.org/D51402 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
