peter.smith added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52784#1252569, @rengolin wrote:
> Hi Peter, > > Looks ok. Why did you need to change all cmdlines to have -EL? I imagine you > just need one for each case, everything else remains the default (which > should still work). I thought that in general we wouldn't know what the default endianness of the assembler we are targeting is so it was safest to be explicit. For a cross-toolchain it is probably inherent in the name, but in theory we could be running clang on a native big-endian system where the assembler is just called as. > Also, it would be interesting to know what happens on cases like "aarch64_be > -EL" et al, and have negative tests for them. Ok will add some more tests. > cheers, > --renato https://reviews.llvm.org/D52784 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits