erik.pilkington added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339#1249457, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> However, short of that concern, this LGTM. I've spoken with the paper author > for the WG14 paper and I think this approach fits their general proposal, so > I don't think we'll have divergence here. Okay, great! Thanks for verifying that. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits