erik.pilkington added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339#1249457, @aaron.ballman wrote:

> However, short of that concern, this LGTM. I've spoken with the paper author 
> for the WG14 paper and I think this approach fits their general proposal, so 
> I don't think we'll have divergence here.


Okay, great! Thanks for verifying that.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to