theraven added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52581#1248306, @smeenai wrote:
> The simplest option is something like https://reviews.llvm.org/P8109, where > we add a `.objc` discriminator when mangling the RTTI itself. It would > require the GNUStep runtime for Windows to be altered accordingly (e.g. > https://github.com/gnustep/libobjc2/blob/master/eh_win32_msvc.cc#L85 would > have to use `".objc.PAU"` instead of `".PAU.objc_cls_"`); would that be > acceptable, @theraven and @DHowett-MSFT? I think that's fine. We have shipped the new ABI for ELF platforms, but not yet for Windows (and we have a few other patches still needed in Clang), and haven't finished the WinObjC integration, so we don't yet have a stable ABI that anyone cares about preserving for this - we explicitly disabled the Windows code paths in clang 7.0, so no one can use them with an unstable ABI without patching clang. As long as we come up with some consistent mangling and it's sensibly documented, I'm happy to make the runtime changes for it. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D52581 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
