devnexen added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CStringSyntaxChecker.cpp:275
+ os << "sizeof(" << DstName << ")";
+ else
+ os << "sizeof(<destination buffer>)";
----------------
MaskRay wrote:
> devnexen wrote:
> > MaskRay wrote:
> > > Why can't this `else if` case be folded into the `strlcpy` case? There
> > > are lots of duplication.
> > >
> > > `strlcpy` does not check `DstName.empty()` but this one does. Is there
> > > any cases I am missing?
> > strlcpy does but agreed with your first statement, this handling case for
> > both are more different than my initial plan defined them.
> Not sure the description of `strlcat` should be different from `strlcpy`...
> For both of them, `len` should be less or equal to the size of `dst`. They
> may just use the same description.
>
> I think your description of `strlcat` (`"The third argument allows to
> potentially copy more bytes than it should. ")` is better while the existing
> description of `strlcpy` is problematic:
>
> os << "The third argument is larger than the size of the input buffer. ";
>
> input => output
Fair enough. Code reduction is always nice anyway.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49722
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
