jkorous added a comment. You might be right - I am assuming here that we want consistent behaviour between constructors and destructors.
IIUC ctors are currently skipped in code completions (in most cases) but they also don't have any type associated while result of their call definitely has some type. Currently we are showing destructors in code completion in clangd (with detail "void") - that's actually how I noticed this. I would assume that canonical type in function/method code completion is "it's type" not "type of result of it's call". WDYT? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D52308 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
