Szelethus added a comment. I played around with it, and this seemed a bit cleaner. Since I would only match against the definition of the record (and the definition of its methods), the matcher would need to look like this: `stmt(hasDescendant(blahBlah(...)))`, and I'd only be able to retrieve (with my limited knowledge) the entire method definition, not the actual `FieldDecl` in the case of a match. I didn'd do a whole lot of AST based analysis, so feel free to correct me on this one ^-^
Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D51866 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
