aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/Attr.td:1531
@@ -1529,1 +1530,3 @@
+def IAInterrupt : InheritableAttr, TargetSpecificAttr<TargetAnyX86> {
+ // NOTE: If you add any additional spellings, ARMInterrupt's,
----------------
Maybe this (and IAInterruptDocs) should be named AnyX86Interrupt as well.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp:4556
@@ +4555,3 @@
+ if (!isFunctionOrMethod(D) || !hasFunctionProto(D) ||
+ !D->getDeclContext()->isFileContext()) {
+ S.Diag(Attr.getLoc(), diag::warn_attribute_wrong_decl_type)
----------------
> Yes, we allow any non-member functions.
Then we should have a test that shows this working with a named namespace
interrupt function. Also, it's a bit odd to me that members of named namespaces
are fine, but static member functions are not. This disallows possibly-sensible
code (like a private static member function of a class for better
encapsulation).
================
Comment at: test/Sema/attr-x86-interrupt.c:54
@@ +53,3 @@
+ foo8((int *)argv); // expected-error {{interrupt service routine can't
be used directly}}
+ return 0;
+}
----------------
I'd like to see a test like:
```
__attribute__((interrupt)) void foo8(int *a) {}
void g(void (*fp)(int *));
void f() {
g(foo8);
}
```
as I think this is supposed to diagnose. It might also be good to have a
similar test using templates in C++.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15709
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
