aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51880#1230221, @JonasToth wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51880#1229513, @aaron.ballman wrote: > > > Missing tests and changes to Registry.cpp for dynamic matchers. > > > > Also, do you want to add `isInstantiationDependent()` at the same time, > > given the relationship with the other two matchers? > > > Do you mean a matcher that does `return Node.isValueDependent() || > Node.isTypeDependent()` or `hasAncestor(expr(anyOf(isValueDependent(), > isTypeDependent())))`? I mean a matcher that does `return Node.isInstantiationDependent();` over `Expr`. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D51880 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
