dim added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15791#317175, @emaste wrote:
> > @davide, any idea whether lld will be able to handle movt correctly? If so, > > we might want to make this dependent on -fuse-ld=bfd or -fuse-ld=lld ? > > > I'm sure lld will handle everything we need eventually (if it does not > already), but I'm not sure it's reasonable to have different behaviour based > on `-fuse-ld` here anyhow -- ld.bfd may well be a recent one from ports. Right, so this really only applies for binutils ld below a certain version, then? IIRC the linker version on the system is detected at configuration time; maybe it can be used instead. Ideally there would be some sort of runtime detection, but it does not sound feasible with ld. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D15791 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
