JonasToth added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50953#1230003, @shuaiwang wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50953#1229287, @JonasToth wrote: > > > What happens to pointers in a typedef (in the sense of `*` instead of `&`)? > > > I checked around and I believe reference type is the only type we're > explicitly matching right now. We'll need to handle carefully when handling > pointer types in the future. We match on pointers as values. So figure this out `int * >const< ptr = nullptr`. And the constness transformation is especially intersting for pointer typedefs, because in `typedef int * IntPtr; const IntPtr p1; IntPtr const p2;` p1 and p2 are different things. It would be nice if you could check, that the value semantic of the pointer is detected through the typedef as well. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D50953 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
