kuhar added a comment. Thank you for the comments, Richard!
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51200#1223745, @rsmith wrote: > Have you considered whether the builtin should apply to `new` expressions? > (There are potentially three different top-level calls implied by a `new` > expression -- an `operator new`, a constructor, and an `operator delete` -- > so it's not completely obvious what effect this would have there.) And > likewise for `delete`. I haven't thought about it, but to be honest I'm not sure what should happen. Intuitively, I think these 3 options would make most sense, listed from the most to the least reasonable in my opionion: 1. apply the corresponding attribute to all of the implied calls 2. apply to constructor/destructor only 1. don't handle it at all -- emit an error How would you suggest to handle it? https://reviews.llvm.org/D51200 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
