On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:47 PM Gabor Marton via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> martong added a comment. > > Ping. > > Manuel, I still don't see how could we apply `match(anyOf(node), > hasDescendant(node))` to the problem of general subtree traversal. > (I'd like to have support for not just `decl()` but other kind of nodes > too.) > Could you please advise how to move on? Also, could you please describe > your specific technical arguments against this patch? > I'm still trying to understand why it's a good idea :) The general technical argument why I'm asking all these questions is that we shouldn't add new things unless they provide significant new features.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
